"Primarily for Sale" in I.R.C. Sections 1221 and 1231 Held to Mean "Principally for Sale" Rather than "Substantially for Sale": Malat v. Riddell
- 期刊名称Michigan Law Review
- 卷第64卷
- 期第8期
- 印刷ISSN0026-2234
- 文件大小975.96KB
- 发表时间1966-06
- DOI10.2307/1287207
- 页码1610-1616
Remembering Ed SparerHoward Lesnick · University of Pennsylvania Law Review · 1984
The Gravamen of the Secondary BoycottHoward Lesnick · Columbia Law Review · 1962
Happy AnniversaryHoward Lesnick · The Labor Lawyer · 1994
RELIGION IN LEGAL THOUGHT AND PRACTICEHOWARD LESNICK · CAMBRIDGE · 2010
Religion in Legal Thought and Practice || AbortionLesnick, Howard · 2010
Religion in Legal Thought and Practice || PrefaceLesnick, Howard · 2010
Religion in Legal Thought and Practice || WarLesnick, Howard · 2010
Preemption Reconsidered: The Apparent Reaffirmation of "Garmon"Howard Lesnick · Columbia Law Review · 1972
The Politics of Postmodern JurisprudenceStephen M. Feldman · Michigan Law Review · 1996
Rhetoric and Reality in Copyright LawStewart E. Sterk · Michigan Law Review · 1996
The Feudal Framework of English LawReview by: Robert C. Palmer · Michigan Law Review · 1981
Specific Performance in France and GermanyJohn P. Dawson · Michigan Law Review · 1959
Incommensurability and Valuation in LawCass R. Sunstein · Michigan Law Review · 1994
Publish or PerishGideon Parchomovsky · Michigan Law Review · 2000
Covenants: Creation by Acceptance of Deed PollMichigan Law Review · 1908
Volume InformationMichigan Law Review · 1909