海量图书期刊资源,随时随地畅享阅读乐趣
Upgrade of the 15 T JUMBO Facility for Time Dependent High Resolution <formula formulatype="inline"><tex notation="TeX">$U(I)$</tex></formula>-MeasurementsHornung, F.; Schneider, T. · IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2009
“Why Wouldn’t I Have Asked Him?”: Herbert Gans, Chapter 9 of the Kerner Report, and the Resolution of a DilemmaLoessberg, Rick · The Review of Black Political Economy · 2019
I Wonât See You in Court! Mediation, arbitration and the nonjudicial resolution of estate and trust disputesEyal, Lyat; von Bassewitz, Susanna · Trusts & Trustees · 2020
The Crystal Structure of H-2Dd MHC Class I Complexed with the HIV-1-Derived Peptide P18-I10 at 2.4 Å Resolution: Implications for T Cell and NK Cell RecognitionAdnane Achour; Karina Persson; Robert A. Harris; Jonas Sundbäck; Charles L. Sentman; Ylva Lindqvist; Gunter Schneider; Klas Kärre · 1998
BOOK REVIEWSBOOK REVIEWSKwiatkowskaBarbaraDrAssociate Director, Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea051990371111116RosenneS., SohnL.B., eds., United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. A Commentary, Vol. V, NordquistM.H., Editor-in-Chief, M. Nijhoff Publ., Dordrecht 1989, 497 pp. + Index, Dfl. 295/$165/£95.Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 19901990T.M.C. Asser PresspdfS0165070X00002813a.pdfdispartBook Reviews1.Vol. I of the series containing the text of the Convention and Introductory Material was published in 1985. The volumes still to be published include: Vol. II – Second Committee: Articles 1 to 132, Annexes I and II, and the Final Act, Annex II; Vol. Ill – First Committee: Articles 133 to 191, Annexes HI and IV, and the Final Act, Annex I, Resolution II; Vol. IV – Third Committee: Articles 192 to 278, and the Final Act, Annex VI; and Vol. VI – Comprehensive Index to Series, consolidated list of treaties, cases and appendices, additional reference material.2.For a general appraisal, see NandanS.N., ‘A Constitution for the Ocean: The 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention’, 1 Marine Policy Reports (1989) pp. 1–12; Council on Ocean Law (COL), The United States and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: A Synopsis of the Status of the Treaty and its Expanded Role in the World Today (1989). Note that the legislative history of the Convention is also the subject of some publications of the United Nations Office for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (OALOS), in particular, Pollution by Dumping (1985, E. 85.V.12); Rights of Access of Land-Locked States to and from the Sea and Freedom of Transit (1987, E.87.V.5); Regime of Islands (1988, E.87.V.11); and Navigation on the High Seas (1989, E.89.V.2). See also QALOS' Master File Containing References to Official Documents of the UNCLOS III (1985, E.85.V.9).3.See RosenneShabtai, Practice and Methods of International Law (1984) pp. 41–42, also pp. 14–15.4.Note that the important evidence of State positiKwiatkowska, Barbara · Netherlands International Law Review · 1990
RölingB.V.A.051976231100103FerenczBenjamin B., Defining International Aggression. The Search for World Peace. A Documentary History and Analysis. With an Introduction by SohnLouis B.. Vol. I (558 pp.), Vol. II (626 pp.). Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry, New York 1975, $75.Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 19761976T.M.C. Asser PresspdfS0165070X0001682Xa.pdfdispartBook Reviews and Book Notices1.E.g. on the words “at the present stage” in the preamble. These words stem from an earlier Soviet draft, which omitted “indirect aggression” and started “at the present stage” with armed force. The French Government later interpreted these words as a reference to the present age, in which so many “weapons of mass destruction” are available (Vol. II, p. 22).2.Thus, Art. 5 has “are” instead of “is” (Vol. II, p. 45).3.RussellRuth B.: A History of the United Nations Charter, The Role of the United States 1940–1945, The Brookings Institution, 1958, p. 465.4.But it should likewise be pointed out that the Resolution, sub 3, is also addressed to all States and appeals to them “to refrain from all acts of aggression and other uses of force contrary to the Charter and the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among states in accordance with the Charter of the U.N.”.5.Military force used in other cases may indeed be legitimate, as is the case with the force that is ordered or recommended by the Security Council, or recommended by the General Assembly. The United Nations may legitimise the use of force in cases other than the action against an “armed attack”, e.g. the Security Council in the case of “a threat to the peace” (the S.C. considered the continuation of the illegal racist regime in S. Rhodesia “a threat to the peace”). The General Assembly has conferred on peoples the right to use force against “apartheid” or colonial exploitation. The “auctoritas” from the classical “betlum justum doctrine” has here been transferred from theRöling, B.V.A. · Netherlands International Law Review · 1976
Synthesis of 5-Oxy-camphorTakeuchi, Kunijiro · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1934
TransactionsOhdake, Sator; Yamagishi, Teikichi · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1935
TransactionsHonda, K.; Wo, C.; Miyaji, N.; Yamafuji, K. · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1941
Additions and CorrectionsBulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1958
TransactionsTange, Ume · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1939
Studies on lsoamylaseKobayashi, Tsuneo · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1955
Studies on AmylosyntheaseMinagawa, Toyosaku · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1935
ErratumTakahasi, Teizo; Asai, Toshinobu · Bulletin of the Agricultural Chemical Society of Japan · 1928